Tuesday, October 9, 2012

A Photo List - Top 25 Favorite Films of All Time...



Top 25 Favorite Films Of All Time:

  1. Jaws
  2. Die Hard
  3. John Carpenter's The Thing
  4. Braveheart
  5. The Bear
  6. One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
  7. Raiders Of The Lost Ark
  8. The Hunchback of Notre Dame 1939
  9. Aliens
  10. Once Upon A Time In The West
  11. Seven Samurai
  12. Roman Holiday
  13. Predator
  14. The Empire Strikes Back
  15. King Kong 1933
  16. Gunga Din
  17. Star Wars
  18. Blood Simple
  19. Unforgiven
  20. Curse of The Demon
  21. Halloween
  22. Robocop
  23. Last Of The Mohicans
  24. Beau Geste
  25. Lethal Weapon
#'s 26 through 50 will be coming soon...

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Review - Looper



At the Theater - Looper - For those who complain about a lack of originality from Hollywood, Looper is a strange but inspired mixture of science fiction, action and crime drama with several doses of left-field weirdness- it's an involving time-travel tale that's skillfully directed, featuring a healthy amount of humor and several small, humanistic, golden touches that often propels it into greatness territory. The film is brutally violent and yet surprisingly touching, exciting and yet though-provoking, with a refreshing minimum of predictability- it never gets too big or unwieldy, maintaining a personal approach throughout.  

Loopers are a squad of hitmen in the year 2042 who are required to execute and dispose of marks sent back from 2072- time travel has been invented then, but deemed illegal, with a powerful, unnamed crime syndicate using a makeshift machine for their unsavory purposes. The story establishes (though somewhat superficially) that it's nearly impossible to get rid of the evidence involving murder in the 2070's because of advanced technologies- targets are captured alive, bound and hooded, then sent back along with a payment of silver to 2042 to be dealt with by the Loopers.  Every so often, Loopers are faced with "closing their loop", an event which involves executing their future selves and subsequently retiring with a handsome payment of gold- all the while knowing that their lives will end 30 years later.

Talented Writer/Director Rian Johnson (Brick, The Brother's Bloom) provides an undeniable directorial flair and a firm grasp on story-telling that helps to quickly reel a viewer in- he's definitely a talent to keep tabs on. Expect some well-written dialogue, an obvious love of Film-Noir and a handful of innovative action sequences.

Joseph Gordon Levitt ((500) Days of Summer, The Lookout) plays the younger version of Joe- a Looper and functional drug-addict who's faced with the dilemma of tracking down and terminating his future self (Bruce Willis) once his loop-closure appointment goes awry while also trying to evade forces hell-bent on punishment. It's an understandably conflicted role, with Gordon Levitt doing an excellent job of acting under a thin layer of makeup effects that the filmmakers decided to apply in order to deal with resemblance issues (he looks like a younger version of Willis, though with maybe a bit too much eye-liner...) The character is about as flawed as one can get, yet you can't help but feel sympathetic for him.

Bruce Willis gives one of his better performances as "Older Joe" here. The action star is given a few brief moments to showcase his emotional range and the results are decidedly positive. Fans will be happy to find that there's also a couple of segments in which Bruno utilizes various hand cannons and machine guns to mow down a good number of henchmen.

Emily Blunt's (The Wolfman, Wild Target) character arrives at the midpoint of the story as a single mother managing a sugar cane farm who takes the "on the lam" Younger Joe in. Her "Sara" is one of 10 percent of the future population, called TK's, who have developed a small amount of telekinetic powers- there's good reason for this supernatural embellishment, as it plays an important role in the plot's proceedings. Blunt makes the most of the role, she's a strong, independent, caring mother who's harboring a dark secret and desperate to protect her son.  I haven't seen a bad performance from the actress yet. I'm quite positive that most viewers will remember the little boy named "Cid" (Pierce Gagnon) in this...

Jeff Daniels makes a few appearances as the crime lord/watchman sent back from the 2070's to keeps tabs on and govern the Loopers, making sure they play by the rules and follow through on "closing" their respective loops once the event presents itself. He's clearly a villain, but strangely likable- then again, isn't Jeff Daniels always likable? I wish there had been much more of him.

Piper Perabo (Coyote Ugly) plays a prostitute dancer that "Younger Joe" has designs for while Paul Dano (Little Miss Sunshine) is a fellow Looper who fails to close his loop- things don't end well for his character in a segment that's rather grotesque. Garret Dillahunt (FOX's Raising Hope) rounds out the notable cast as a Gat, a sentry out to kill both the Older and Younger Joes- his lone scene is quietly explosive... ;)

Complaints- distinguishing viewers are likely to point out more than a few possible plot holes, logistical leaps and sketchy details when it comes to the reasoning behind the existence/function of Loopers, their eventual Loop closures and events of the far future that appear to contradict the rules.  Although I'm normally not the type to give in to contrivance (and there's a good helping of that here), I found myself more immersed in the immediate, onscreen story, the excellent performances and inherent directorial flair- in short, I enjoyed so many other aspects of the film that I was able to forgive it for it's flaws. Others might not find themselves as forgiving and I could definitely understand that.

The trailers for this film were a bit misleading, as there are essentially two very different storylines that eventually interconnect- one of which did not appear to be touched upon in the various previews and TV spots (at least not in the many that I bore witness to).  That's a good thing, in my opinion, as a large portion of the second half of the film comes largely as an unexpected surprise. I'll only reveal that it involves a small child who throws some rather impressive temper tantrums...

All things considered, I think Looper is one of the better films of the year and comes highly recommended.

8.5 out of 10

Monday, October 1, 2012

Review- Dredd





At the Theater - Dredd - Absolutely nothing like the campy 1995 Stallone film, Judge Dredd- this is as gritty, bloody and as deadly serious as a futuristic action film gets. Think the tone of 1987's Robocop (without the satirical commercials) mixed with the premise of 1988's Die Hard (and very similar to this year's The Raid: Redemption)- shut off completely from outside assistance, the titular hero and his rookie empath, Anderson (Olivia Thirlby), must ascend to the top of the fortified and crime-infested "Peach Trees" tower block and bring the vicious drug-lord Ma-Ma (Lena Headey- "Queen Gorgo" in 300) to justice, all the while dispatching countless heavily armed thugs. 

The entirety of the story unfolds over the course of several hours while 95% of the film is set in the aforementioned "Peach Trees" high-rise- it could have easily been retitled: A Day On Patrol With Judge Dredd. It's a simplistic yet fully functional approach. The action and effects are very well filmed and staged, with the 3D aspect of the film kicking into high gear during sequences in which the designer drug Slo-Mo come into play- users find themselves experiencing reality at a fraction of it's normal speed, making for some visually striking segments that I found rather impressive.  Be forewarned: this film is extremely bloody, with a few moments of outright gore that had me actually wincing.

Karl Urban is perfect in the role as "Dredd"- he's got presence to spare and portrays the character with control and determination, without any ego to speak of and never feeling it necessary that audiences must know that it's actually him under the helmet- yes, the helmet never comes off in the film. Very cool. The suit here is also a definite upgrade over the '95 film.

Olivia Thirlby (Juno) surprised me in that the actress shows some verve- her character here is fully worth-while, well-utilized and with purpose.  "Anderson" never falls into "wise-cracking sidekick" or "damsel in distress" mode and I appreciated that.

Leana Heady, as the scarred villainess Ma-Ma, is effectively grungy and chilling in her scenes- though I would have appreciated a couple more "hands-on" segments in which her character takes more of a direct role in the proceedings. Her comeuppance is rather memorable...

Wood Harris (Remember The Titans), as one of Ma-Ma's top-tier underlings, rounds out the notable cast.

Dredd is a smaller-budgeted affair by Hollywood's theatrically-released standards, but surprisingly centered and perfectly efficient for what it's worth- one might think of it as one of the largest budgeted fan films ever made. It's obvious that the film was crafted with the input of those who appreciated and respected the character and comic. It's a great re-introduction of the character that "gets it right" this go-round.

Sadly, it appears very few wanted to see this film in theaters as it has pretty much bombed here in the U.S. - there's no good reason for that as it should eventually take it's place amongst the absolute best Rated R comic book movies ever made.

Highly Recommended for fans of the subject matter.

Dredd - 8.0 out of 10



FWIW - Judge Dredd (1995) - 5.0 out of 10

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Review- The Hunger Games



 At the Theater - The Hunger Games - I haven't read the book this was based upon and don't intend to. If a film is good enough, it will stand on it's own- see JAWS, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest or The Shawshank Redemption for clear-cut inarguable proof of this.  That established, The Hunger Games isn't bad but ultimately not my cup of tea- it's a flawed, often generic, but otherwise passable diversion whose target audience definitely doesn't include mid-30's males who enjoy the NFL and NBA.  I still don't know what compelled me to see it nor do I understand the rabid fervor behind this phenomenon after my viewing- it just might be the most bland Box-Office mega-smash to date...

The "stranger in a strange land" angle is woefully underdone here- so many scared young people plucked from the ranks of starving poverty and suddenly plopped into an extravagantly rich lifestyle (which the film spends very little time exploring) with so few segments of wide-eyed wonder and adaptation. Question and an observation: How is a young person who was raised her entire life in a Great Depression Era-like environment (ahem, which the film spends very little time exploring), with little or no technology in sight, able to quickly navigate a complex remote control and television with such ease?  Food is obviously at a minimum with people scrounging for small animals to eat and/or use as currency, yet our heroine is wearing a pristine, finely tailored $300+ leather jacket... hmmm.

Director Gary Ross (Seabiscuit) has fashioned a rather emotionally uninvolving tale- I couldn't quite buy into the lead character's desperation or subsequent hardships because each time the going got tough or looked a bit too grim a little nugget of salvation would come falling conveniently from the skies- it's an aspect of the game that works against any buildup of tension. Pivotal "tribute" characters are also given precious little screen-time yet we're supposed to feel absolutely devastated with their respective deaths. A few fuzzy, bendable rules (once again, very convenient) are also counterproductive. Katniss' character spent very little time reflecting on her life and current situation-  as a result, Jennifer Lawrence is merely serviceable in the role and should have been given more free-reign to breathe life into the character.

Apparently the future is rife with atrocious wigs and the desire to dress in various shades of pink and purple- perhaps if the cinematography/visual style were a bit more dynamic or the vistas more FX heavy and gaudily impressive I would have bought into it, but as it is...

Stanley Tucci's game-show host (sporting some obnoxiously fake chompers and a funny blue 'do) is a token character we've seen portrayed many times before and often better- how about Richard Dawson from The Running Man?  Even Michael C. Hall in Gamer had more villainous panache... . Elizabeth Banks (slathered in white makeup and hidden beneath pink ruffles) is a difficult character to get a hold on- why don't these teen gladiators being sent out to certain slaughter hate her more given what she represents?   Woody Harrelson (yep, you guessed it- bad wig)  is a former Champion who shows a slight spark in his eyes from time to time- alas, it's one that never fully lights fire.  Toby Jones (awful wig) is nearly unrecognizable and has one discernible line.  Wes Bentley sports a funky beard and his trademark, seemingly permanent icy glare as the games producer.  Donald Sutherland makes little more than a cameo playing... Donald Sutherland.  If Isabella Fuhrman (Orphan) had been given more of a character arc and time to shine I'm sure she would have made an excellent villain- she's that talented.  Josh Hutcherson is surprisingly solid- I'm guessing his height has been a detriment in garnering more roles.  Liam Hemsworth is here to complete a love-triangle sub-plot that never gets off the ground.  Strangely enough, I'm picking Lenny Kravitz as the scene-stealer- dude's effectively (and unexpectedly) likable.

The Hunger Games is a film that desperately needed more of the "Damn the Man!" type sentiment from those being exploited and a bit more "creativity" as far as the deaths of fellow tributes are handled- another 15-20 minutes of character building might have worked wonders...

*There is a scene involving a cgi mutant dog (think the Terror Dogs from Ghostbusters, yet hornless here) that will more than likely have you jump out of your seat.

Watch the similarly themed Battle Royale (2000) if you want to experience a film with some real "edge" to it- afterwards, you might find yourself believing that The Hunger Games just ripped it off and watered it down for teen girls...

6.5 out of 10

Monday, September 3, 2012

Film Review - The Raid: Redemption (2012)




On Blu Ray and DVD - "The Raid: Redemption" - Gritty, brutal and bloody as all hell- martial arts and asian cinema fans definitely need to check this out.  Twenty SWAT team members infiltrate a thirty story high-rise determined to take down a ruthless crime lord, only to find themselves outnumbered and surrounded by an army of thugs, completely cut off from outside help and desperate to stay alive.  Most of the little logistical problems I came up with as the story opened up were alleviated by film's end.  Expect several elaborate and well-choreographed martial arts fight scenes (showcasing the Indonesian Martial art form known as Silat) , a few extended shootouts and knife fights capped off with a couple of big twists in the third act- the proceedings are competently filmed and the story conveys a fair amount of tension.

Iko Uwais (Action Film fans should get used to his name) stars as "The Rookie" character, thrust into a leadership role and responsible for guiding the dwindling survivors in an attempt at escape.  Dude's got a fair amount of presence and seems like a solid actor- there's no reason we shouldn't be seeing more of him in future action films.  There's one helluva tough little henchman known as "Mad Dog" (played by professional Silat instructor Yayan Ruhian) that should prove to steal the movie outright with this crazy moves and endless energy.

There's very little CGI and absolutely no "wire-fu" to speak of here- it's a stunt-heavy, straight-forward action film that should please fans of the genre.  There's a sequel and an Americanized remake on the way so those interested should go ahead and check it out before it gets watered down. 

Recommended

8.5 out of 10 

Review- Lawless




At the Theater - Lawless - This 1930's Prohibition-Era (based upon a true story) tale of Virginia bootleggers ends up somewhere between good and very good but nowhere near great- it's much better filmed and acted than written or directed.  That said, this is Director John Hillcoat's (The Proposition- liked it, The Road- didn't care for it) most accessible work of his limited feature film efforts.  Viewers will undoubtedly remember Guy Pearce's (Memento, L.A. Confidential) scene-stealing performance as a sadistic "Special Agent Man" - a couple more extended scenes featuring his reptilian presence might have propelled him amongst the ranks of the all-time infamous greats. The dude oozes evil here and that wide part he sports down the middle of his hair is killer.

While I'm not much a fan of the young Actor, Shia Labeouf once again displays an undeniable talent- he portrays the impressionistic "Jack Bondurant" here,  the youngest sibling of three real-life, moonshine-running brothers.  Although he'll never be able to shake the boyishness to be believable as a pure action star (I mean, c'mon, can you ever really see him kicking ass alongside Jason Statham?) there should be a wealth of quality dramatic roles in his future.  His character is likable enough, and much more involving than any other in the film.

I couldn't shake the notion that Tom Hardy's ("Bane" in The Dark Knight Rises, as if you didn't know) character is a bit of a contradiction- his grumbling "Forrest Bondurant" (the leader of the three brothers) is presented as some kind of legendary, unstoppable enforcer/brute that can't quite muster the heroic goods in two defining sequences where he ends up more of a hapless victim than anything else.  He dishes out some old-fashioned "justice-with-a-mean-streak" here and there, but not when it really counts- those hoping for a substantial confrontation between his and Pearce's slimy villain will be let down.  I understood the reasoning (it sets the stage for a more "innocent" character to shine through in the clutch) but couldn't get past it's uneven and predictable execution.

Gary Oldman fans might also find themselves disappointed- the actor only shows up in a few scenes as a flashy Gangster that "Jack" wishes to pattern himself after.  I felt Oldman's character lacked a dynamic- he simply isn't given the material or time to truly shine in what amounts to a decidedly trivial role.  It's rather frustrating that seasoned veteran greats like Oldman are having to settle for smaller bit parts. Yeah, it's a paycheck, but those who've seen the Actor's performances in The Professional or Romeo Is Bleeding should understand.

Jessica Chastain (The Help, The Debt) looks prettier than ever- she's quite good here (in yet another underwritten role) as a Chicago dancer mistakenly looking for a change of pace as a backwoods bartendress.  Mia Wasikowska is the "farmer's daughter" that young "Jack" courts- the naturally pretty actress is solid and should have a massive 2013 (she has five films slated for next year).  Jason Clarke (Rabbit Proof Fence), playing "Howard Bondurant", and Noah Taylor (Almost Famous) round out the familiar faces.  Something about newcomer Dane DeHaan (Chronicle), a teenaged bootlegger friend of "Jack's", reminds me of a young Leonardo DiCaprio.

The countryside cinematography is very nice (though Georgia is subbing for Virginia here) while the period clothing, vehicles and set pieces all feel authentic.  Expect some rather graphic violence and bloodletting throughout- it's appropriate for the subject matter and I wouldn't have it any other way. The third act of the film (which includes my aforementioned issues with Tom Hardy's character) is my chief complaint- it feels disjointed and rushed, almost a bit bizarre in it's lack of emotional punch given what's come before.  It's another film where the buildup is far better than the payoff. I liked it, but it's not nearly as good as similarly themed films like The Untouchables, Road to Perdition, Public Enemies or Miller's Crossing

7.5 out of 10